WASHINGTON — As scrutiny of the Jeffrey Epstein files intensifies, a familiar misdirection has reemerged: claims that Epstein worked for Russia. That theory collapses under even minimal examination. There is no evidentiary trail—no financial transfers, no handlers, no intelligence reporting, no corroborated testimony—linking Epstein to Russian intelligence.
The same cannot be said for Israel.
When the documented record is examined honestly, the intelligence allegations surrounding Epstein point consistently, repeatedly, and exclusively toward Israeli intelligence interests. The Russia narrative functions not as an explanation, but as a smokescreen—a geopolitical decoy designed to pull scrutiny away from where the evidence actually leads.
FBI Source Reports Identify Israeli Intelligence — Not Russia
FBI FD-1023 forms and Confidential Human Source (CHS) reports reference claims that Epstein was co-opted by allied intelligence services, specifically identifying Israel and Mossad. These statements are attributed to individuals with direct proximity to Epstein and to elite U.S. legal and political circles.
Notably absent from these records:
Any reference to Russian intelligence handlers
Any operational linkage to Moscow
Any financial or logistical tie to Russian state entities
Russia appears nowhere in the contemporaneous intelligence reporting. Israel does—repeatedly.
Epstein’s Network Aligns With Israeli Strategic Interests
Epstein’s social and operational network aligns with known Israeli intelligence priorities:
Targeting U.S. political leadership, financiers, scientists, and media figures
Leveraging sexual compromise for long-term influence
Operating through private wealth structures and offshore secrecy
Maintaining plausible deniability via “unofficial” asset status
This is not conjecture. It is standard intelligence tradecraft, historically documented in multiple Israeli intelligence operations.
Epstein’s role was not ideological. It was functional.
The Dershowitz Statements Are Central — And Ignored
One of the most explosive components of the FBI source reporting involves statements attributed to Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, a figure deeply embedded in U.S.–Israel legal and political advocacy networks. According to CHS accounts, Dershowitz relayed that Epstein had intelligence affiliations tied to Israel.
Rather than interrogate this claim under oath, federal authorities buried it.
If the allegation were false, it demanded immediate repudiation.
If it were true, it demanded criminal and counterintelligence action.
Neither occurred.
Epstein’s Protection Mirrors Israeli Asset Handling
Epstein received treatment that defies any ordinary criminal explanation:
A non-prosecution agreement shielding unnamed co-conspirators
Continued freedom after authorities knew he was trafficking minors
No counterintelligence designation despite foreign-influence indicators
A death in federal custody that conveniently ended all inquiry
This is asset containment, not prosecutorial discretion.
If Epstein had been a Russian operative, the response would have been public, loud, and punitive. The silence is itself evidence of allied sensitivity.
Russia Is the Convenient Villain — Israel Is the Untouchable Ally
Accusing Russia costs nothing politically. Accusing Israel triggers immediate shutdown.
That is why the Russia theory is allowed to circulate despite lacking evidence, while Israeli intelligence allegations are aggressively labeled “antisemitic” to avoid examination. This tactic conflates state intelligence scrutiny with religious or ethnic identity, a maneuver that protects power by weaponizing outrage.
The subject here is Mossad and Israeli state interests, not Jewish people.
Why Epstein Matters to Israeli Intelligence
Epstein provided:
Long-term leverage over U.S. decision-makers
Insurance files on powerful individuals
Quiet influence without diplomatic fingerprints
Strategic access without formal diplomatic risk
He was the perfect asset: wealthy, connected, morally compromised, and disposable.
The FBI’s Silence Is the Final Corroboration
The FBI has never produced:
A counterintelligence clearance ruling Epstein out as an Israeli asset
A documented refutation of Mossad involvement
A rationale for ignoring foreign-influence indicators
Instead, the Bureau sealed records, stonewalled Congress, and allowed the narrative to fracture into confusion.
That is not transparency. That is damage control.
The Conclusion the Evidence Supports
Jeffrey Epstein was not a Russian operative. There is no evidence he worked for Russia.
There is evidence—documented, repeated, and strategically ignored—that he functioned as an Israeli intelligence asset, operating through kompromat, protected by U.S. institutional silence, and terminated before he could testify.
This was not an accident.
This was not negligence.
This was not a lone predator.
This was an operation.
And until the intelligence files are released and decision-makers testify under oath, the Epstein case remains not only a criminal scandal—but a foreign-influence failure of historic magnitude.
No comments:
Post a Comment