The Pahlavi family’s rise to power did not emerge from democratic legitimacy. It began with a military seizure of authority and was later restored through an illegal foreign coup that dismantled Iran’s constitutional order.
In 1921, Reza Khan, a military officer, carried out a coup against Iran’s weakened Qajar dynasty. Four years later, under pressure and political coercion, Iran’s parliament deposed the Qajar monarch and crowned Reza Khan as Reza Shah, inaugurating the Pahlavi dynasty. His rule was authoritarian from the outset, defined by repression, forced centralization, and the suppression of political opposition.
During World War II, Reza Shah was removed by British and Soviet forces, who distrusted his neutrality and feared German influence. He was replaced not by popular consent, but by foreign military decision, with his son Mohammad Reza Pahlavi installed as shah.
The defining rupture came in 1953, when Iran’s democratically elected prime minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, was overthrown in a CIA- and MI6-orchestrated coup. This operation violated Iran’s constitution, subverted its parliament, and relied on bribery, manufactured unrest, and the manipulation of the monarchy. The shah’s temporary flight from the country underscored the coup’s illegitimacy; he lacked both constitutional authority and popular backing at the time.
The United States and Britain did not merely influence events — they illegally dismantled Iran’s sovereign democratic government to protect Western oil interests and geopolitical control. Mohammad Reza Shah was restored not through law, but through covert foreign intervention called Operation Ajax.
Operation Ajax, the codename for the 1953 coup, was a covert intelligence operation jointly executed by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency and Britain’s MI6. The operation relied on bribing Iranian politicians, military officers, clerics, journalists, and street gangs; spreading disinformation through controlled media; and manufacturing chaos to create the appearance of popular unrest. When the initial coup attempt failed and the shah fled the country, U.S. intelligence operatives escalated the operation, directly coordinating with loyalist military units to overthrow Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh by force. Declassified U.S. government documents later confirmed that Operation Ajax was designed explicitly to destroy Iran’s constitutional democracy and reinstall the shah as a compliant ruler aligned with Western oil and strategic interests. The coup was illegal under Iranian law, violated Iran’s sovereignty, and marked the moment when foreign intelligence agencies decisively replaced Iranian self-determination with externally imposed rule—an intervention whose consequences still define Iran’s political trauma today.
This history is no longer disputed. Declassified U.S. and British records confirm that Iran’s democracy was deliberately destroyed, and that the monarchy’s survival thereafter depended on external power, not internal legitimacy.
The shah’s subsequent rule relied on repression enforced by the secret police, SAVAK, which operated with foreign training and support. Torture, mass surveillance, imprisonment, and executions became routine. The regime collapsed in 1979 because it had lost all domestic legitimacy — not because of foreign subversion.
This is the political inheritance Reza Pahlavi carries.
Reza Pahlavi: Heir to an Illegitimate Restoration
Reza Pahlavi was born in 1960 and named crown prince as a child. He left Iran during the revolution and has lived almost entirely outside the country he now seeks to lead. He has never held office, never governed, and has never been accountable to Iranian voters.
His education and political formation took place largely in the United States. His claim to leadership rests not on popular mandate, but on dynastic inheritance, foreign access, and external political validation.
A Manufactured Opposition Figure
For years, Reza Pahlavi functioned as a symbolic exile. In recent years, however, he has moved aggressively to present himself as a preselected transitional authority, complete with emergency governance plans and timelines for assuming power after regime collapse.
These frameworks were not produced through Iranian civic institutions or broad opposition consensus. They were drafted and circulated through exile networks, foreign-facing organizations, and policy circles abroad.
His public praise for U.S. and Israeli military strikes on Iran, combined with calls for Iranian security forces to defect during active conflict, signals not democratic neutrality but alignment with external coercion as the pathway to power.
Foreign Backing: Open, Strategic, and Purposeful
Reza Pahlavi’s foreign engagements are explicit and deliberate.
He has met publicly with senior Israeli leadership and has repeatedly urged Western governments to escalate sanctions, diplomatic isolation, and pressure campaigns against Iran — policies that devastate civilian life while weakening the state.
During military escalations in 2026, he publicly framed foreign attacks on Iran as steps toward “liberation.” This posture mirrors the historical method by which his father’s rule was restored: foreign force first, authority later.
The result is a growing perception — both inside Iran and among opposition groups — that Reza Pahlavi is not emerging organically, but is being installed, elevated, and internationally marketed as a familiar and compliant alternative acceptable to foreign powers.
No Criminal Convictions — But Illegitimacy Is the Issue
There is no public record of criminal convictions against Reza Pahlavi. That is beside the point.
The central issue is legitimacy, not criminality.
The 1953 coup was illegal. The monarchy that followed was imposed. Its collapse was inevitable. Reza Pahlavi’s current ascent follows the same structure: external authorization substituted for internal consent.
Opposition Fractures and Internal Rejection
Iran’s opposition remains deeply divided, and Reza Pahlavi is among its most polarizing figures. Kurdish, republican, leftist, and grassroots movements have openly rejected monarchist restoration and expressed distrust of dynastic return.
His prominence is strongest not inside Iran, but in Western capitals, foreign media, and allied governments — reinforcing the perception that his authority would flow downward from abroad, not upward from the Iranian people.
The Installation Narrative Follows Historical Precedent
Claims that Reza Pahlavi is being “installed” are often dismissed as conspiratorial. Iran’s history makes that dismissal untenable.
The mechanisms are familiar: sanctions, isolation, military pressure, elite exile coordination, and a preapproved leader waiting in the wings. Iran has seen this movie before.
Reza Pahlavi is not merely an opposition voice. He is being actively positioned, internationally legitimized, and strategically advanced at a moment of maximum external pressure on Iran.
That does not guarantee success.
But it establishes intent.
Bottom Line
Reza Pahlav is the heir to a dynasty born of force, restored through an illegal foreign coup, and overthrown by popular revolt. Today, he is again being elevated amid foreign confrontation with Iran — not through democratic mobilization inside the country, but through external sponsorship and geopolitical calculation.
Iran’s past shows where this path leads. Whether Iranians are prepared to accept it again remains the unresolved question at the center of the current crisis.

No comments:
Post a Comment