Showing posts with label transgender. Show all posts
Showing posts with label transgender. Show all posts

Friday, February 6, 2026

California School District Under Federal Investigation After Muslim Student Driven Out by Threats, Harassment, and Administrative Neglect



A California public school district is now under federal civil rights investigation after a Muslim teenage girl says administrators stood by while she was harassed, threatened with death, and effectively forced out of school athletics for asserting her religious boundaries.

Hadeel Hazameh, a student at Jurupa Valley High School, did not demand special treatment. She did not call for anyone’s exclusion. She asked for one thing: not to be compelled to undress in a locker room with a transgender athlete, citing her Islamic faith and modesty requirements.

What followed, she says, was a campaign of intimidation that the school failed—or refused—to stop.

According to Hazameh, classmates openly mocked her, insulted her religion, and escalated their attacks to death threats. The abuse was not hidden. It was visible, repeated, and known. Yet school officials allegedly allowed the hostile environment to persist, offering no meaningful protection while the student who reported the threats paid the price.

The outcome was predictable and damning: Hazameh quit volleyball. She quit track and field. She rushed to graduate early—not because she wanted to, but because remaining on campus had become untenable.

A Student Removed, While the System Remained Untouched

Hazameh’s experience raises a blunt question: when a student reports threats and harassment rooted in religion and sex, who is actually protected by school policy?

Not the student who left.

With the assistance of Advocates for Faith & Freedom, Hazameh and another student filed suit against Jurupa Unified School District, alleging violations of Title IX and religious discrimination. Their claim is not abstract. It is grounded in consequences: the loss of educational opportunity, athletic participation, and basic safety.

Federal authorities have now stepped in. The U.S. Department of Education has opened a civil rights investigation into the district, examining whether its policies—and its inaction—violated federal law by discriminating against female athletes and failing to protect students from harassment.

This case is one of at least 18 active federal investigations nationwide into school districts and colleges over similar policies.

Ideology Over Duty of Care

The Jurupa district was already under scrutiny following high-profile victories by a transgender athlete in girls’ track-and-field events, a controversy that drew national attention, forfeited games, and political commentary from then-President Donald Trump.

But Hazameh’s case shifts the focus from competition to something more fundamental: whether schools are abandoning their duty of care to students who dissent from prevailing ideology.

Title IX does not permit schools to sacrifice one student’s safety to avoid controversy. Civil rights law does not allow administrators to ignore death threats because responding would be politically inconvenient.

Yet that is precisely what Hazameh alleges happened.

Federal Law, Not Optional Guidelines

In February 2025, the Trump administration issued an executive order directing federal agencies to interpret Title IX as prohibiting transgender participation in female sports categories and authorizing the withholding of federal funds from noncompliant institutions.

Whether one agrees with that policy or not is beside the point. Schools are not permitted to selectively enforce civil rights protections—nor are they allowed to punish religious students by neglect.

If Hazameh’s allegations are substantiated, the district’s failure would represent more than poor judgment. It would constitute a civil rights violation carried out through indifference.

The Message Sent to Students

The message Hazameh says she received was unmistakable: speak up, and you will be isolated; assert your faith, and you will be removed; endure threats quietly, or leave.

She left.

As federal investigators now review the district’s actions, the case stands as a test of whether public schools still recognize religious freedom and female student protections as enforceable rights—or as obstacles to be managed away.

For Hazameh, the cost has already been paid. The question now is whether the system that failed her will be held accountable.


Thursday, July 27, 2017

Iraq war veteran explains why Trump's decision to ban transgenders is good

 President Trump announced Wednesday morning that transgender individuals would no longer be allowed to serve in the military, a disabled combat veteran spoke out about the president’s decision via Twitter.

 J.R. Salzman, an Iraq war veteran who lost his right arm below the elbow and sustained a traumatic brain injury during combat in 2006, explained why Trump’s decision to bar transgender individuals from serving makes sense.














Monday, August 22, 2016

FEDERAL JUDGE RULES AGAINST OBAMA'S PERVERTED SCHOOL AGED BATHROOM DECREE



FEDERAL JUDGE RULES AGAINST OBAMA'S PERVERTED SCHOOL AGED BATHROOM DECREE. YOU MUST USE THE BATHROOM, LOCKER ROOM AND SHOWER OF YOUR BIOLOGICAL SEX.

A federal judge is halting the Obama administration’s order compelling public schools nationwide to permit restroom and locker room access on the basis of gender identity.

U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor said the administration “failed to comply” with federal rule-making procedures, siding with Texas and 12 other states that sued the federal government over the order.

“Defendants are enjoined from enforcing the Guidelines against Plaintiffs and their respective schools, school boards, and other public, educationally-based institutions,” the judge ordered Sunday.

Mr. O’Connor made clear that the “resolution of this difficult policy issue is not, however, the subject of this order.”

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said he is “pleased that the court ruled against the Obama Administration’s latest illegal federal overreach.”

Wednesday, July 13, 2016

Another Man Caught In Female Area At Target Taking Pictures


This isn't the first time that this has been reported but liberals still believe it is ok for men to be in women's bathrooms, dressing rooms and showers.

An Idaho man who told police he identifies as a woman was arrested Tuesday after allegedly taking photos of a woman in a Target fitting room, officials said.



Sean Patrick Smith, 43, was allegedly dressed in women’s clothing when he entered the fitting room in the women’s section of the store in Ammon on Monday, East Idaho News reported. Smith, also known as Shauna Patricia Smith, then began taking pictures of a woman in the changing stall next to him, police said.

Target stores currently allow men who say they are women, into female restrooms and dressing rooms.  Until this policy is changed it really is not safe for your mom, wife, daughter or any female loved one to be inside Target.

Tuesday, May 24, 2016

Address The 31 Genders Correct In New York Or Face A Six Figure Fine

Yes in New York there is supposedly 31 different genders of human beings.

The insane are running New York City led by their whack job
Mayor  Bill De Blasio.

Individuals living in New York City can choose from a minimum of 31 different gender identities, many of which allow them to fluctuate between some version or combination of male or female identities.


Businesses that don’t respect and accommodate an individual’s chosen gender identity risk incurring six-figure fines under rules implemented by the city’s Commission on Human Rights.

The business community in New York needs to stand together and put a stop to this nonsense! 

Monday, May 23, 2016

Hershey's Follows Target's Lead Allows Men In Women's Bathrooms

This one may sting a little, but it is time to boycott Hershey's chocolates and park,  Hershey Park can no longer be
considered a family amusement park.

Hersheypark has publicly declared its position on what type of restrooms transgender people can use. The amusement park says guests and employees may continue to use restrooms with which they gender-identify, or they’re welcome to use a family restroom.

 A statement released by Hershey Entertainment and Resorts Company spokeswoman Kathy Burrows says Hersheypark, “has and will always strive to accommodate all guests and employees – including members of the LGBT community – to ensure those visiting or working at Hersheypark are comfortable and feel secure.” Hershey Entertainment and Resorts is the latest company to make a stand on the debate.

So now we have an American amusement park where kids go to play, to now be joined by men in female bathrooms at Hershey's thrill park facility in Pennsylvania. 50 percent of visitors mostly under the age of 18 who now have to share bathrooms with male predators. This should sicken us more then even the issue being policy at Target, because amusement parks are where our children go to play for the summer.

The sad part about this is that amusement parks are an American past time in the summer months. Now where kids go to play and are usually mostly alone without their parents unlike Target, might just be a more dangerous situation because kids could get picked off rather easily at amusement parks.

Starbucks and book retailer Barnes & Noble have similar policies

After Target losing over $4Billion in the last 30 days, these corporations should have learned something.


#BoycottHersheys #BoycottTarget #BoycottStarbucks #BoycottBarnesandNobles

Sunday, May 15, 2016

Obama Sent His Letter Threatening Schools, Now It's Time To Send Ours



On Friday Obama issued an edict outside his realm of authority in the Executive Branch demanding that all public schools, from preschool through high school, allow males into female bathrooms in public schools across our nation. The executive branch does NOT have the authority to make law.

Here is our letter to all the public school districts and yes you have permission to copy and share.  In fact we want you to do so.


To the Superintendent of schools, school Principals, teachers and associated staff:

 The recent "guidance" sent to your schools by the Obama Administration regarding the accommodations you are to make for transgendered students is an unacceptable usurpation of State, Local and most importantly, parental authority and must not be implemented.

 The implementation of this "guidance" is nothing short of criminal facilitation of indecent exposure at the least, and potentially sexual assault.

 If members of my family are subjected to the exposure of genitalia of the opposite sex while under your supervision, I will see charges of criminal facilitation levied against the school district, board, superintendent, principal, teachers and associated staff.

 I will also pursue civil action against all the above, both institutionally and personally.

 I would like to know the intentions of the (Your City) Public Schools regarding this "guidance," and your specific plans regarding the issue.

 Sincerely,  




Why Christians Cannot Except Transgenderism or Homosexuality


Christians cannot accept the transvestite lifestyle which is now commonly referred to as transgenderism.

True practicing Christians take to heart the very words in the Bible as God's word.  In Deuteronomy, which is also is in the Jewish book the Torah, God is quite clear "The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the Lord the God."

Now for you heathens that want to use the weak argument about Christians eating pork or shellfish, you need to have an understanding of biblical covenants.

A covenant is a binding solemn agreement made between two parties. It generally leaves each with obligations. But it holds only between the parties involved.

There are a number of biblical covenants: Noahic, Abrahamic, Sinaitic (Old), Davidic and New.

Under the Noahic covenant, which God made with all living human beings (Genesis 9:8-17), people were able to eat anything:

‘Everything that lives and moves about will be food for you. Just as I gave you the green plants, I now give you everything’ (Genesis 9:3).

But under the Sinaitic (Old) Covenant, which God made with the nation of Israel, people were able to eat certain foods, but not others. These are listed in detail in Leviticus 11:1-47 and Deuteronomy 14:1-21).

However these laws were applicable only to the nation of Israel and were intended to set them apart from other races.

The Old (Sinaitic) Covenant was made after Israel’s deliverance from Egypt and involved laws, priests (all of whom were members of the tribe of Levi) and a sacrificial system based on animal sacrifice. It was aimed at protecting Israel from God’s wrath and judgement.

The nation of Israel, however, was unable to keep the requirements of the Old Covenant, meaning that a New Covenant was necessary, as foretold by the prophet Jeremiah:

‘“The days are coming,” declares the Lord, “when I will make a new covenant with the people of Israel and with the people of Judah. It will not be like the covenant I made with their ancestors when I took them by the hand to lead them out of Egypt, because they broke my covenant, though I was a husband to them,” declares the Lord.“This is the covenant I will make with the people of Israel after that time,” declares the Lord.“I will put my law in their mind and write it on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people. No longer will they teach their neighbour, or say to one another, ‘Know the Lord,’because they will all know me, from the least of them to the greatest, declares the Lord. “For I will forgive their wickedness and will remember their sins no more.”’ (Jeremiah 31:31-34)

Jesus said that he had come to fulfil the ‘Law and the Prophets’ (Matthew 5:17; Luke 24:44). He would establish this new covenant with new laws, with himself as high priest based on his own sacrificial death on the cross.

This new covenant would completely deal with sin (Hebrews 10:1-18) and protect all those who put their faith in him from God’s wrath and judgement (See more on this here).

‘In the same way, after the supper (Jesus) took the cup, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you”’ (Luke 22:20). ‘…we have been made holy through the sacrifice of the body of Jesus Christ once for all’ (Hebrews 10:10)

People would come under the protection of this new covenant, not by virtue of belonging to the nation of Israel, but through faith in Christ. In fact the function of the Old Testament Law (Sinaitic covenant) was to point to Christ as its fulfilment.

‘So the law was our guardian until Christ came that we might be justified by faith. Now that this faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian. So in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith, for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Gentile…’ (Galatians 3:24-28)

The Apostle Paul makes this very clear in saying:

‘I myself am not under the law… though I am not free from God’s law but am under Christ’s law’ (1 Corinthians 9:20, 21)

So what then did Christ say about foods? He pronounced all foods clean for his followers to eat:

‘ “Don’t you see that nothing that enters a person from the outside can defile them?  For it doesn’t go into their heart but into their stomach, and then out of the body.” (In saying this, Jesus declared all foods clean.) He went on: “What comes out of a person is what defiles them.  For it is from within, out of a person’s heart, that evil thoughts come—sexual immorality, theft, murder,  adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance and folly.  All these evils come from inside and defile a person.” (Mark 7:18-23)

Jesus was making that point that under the new covenant God required purity of the heart. Internal thoughts and attitudes were as important as external actions.  Consistent with this God commanded the apostle Peter to eat food that was forbidden under the Old Covenant:

‘Then a voice told him, “Get up, Peter. Kill and eat.” “Surely not, Lord!” Peter replied. “I have never eaten anything impure or unclean.” The voice spoke to him a second time, “Do not call anything impure that God has made clean.” (Acts 10:13-15)

Similarly the apostle Paul taught that all foods were admissible under the New Covenant:

‘(hypocritical liars)… order them to abstain from certain foods, which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and who know the truth.  For everything God created is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving,  because it is consecrated by the word of God and prayer.’ (1 Timothy 4:2-5)

So Christians can eat anything, including shellfish.

But what about sex?

The Bible, consistently throughout, teaches that sex is only permissible within a marriage between a man and a woman. This principle is first laid down during the creation narrative:

‘a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh’ (Genesis 2:24)

It is upheld in the Old Covenant and in great detail every sexual act outside this pattern is listed as off limits in Leviticus 18 and 20.

Jesus upholds the same principle in his teaching on marriage (Matthew 19:1-12) and its importance is emphasized to Gentile Christians (Acts 15:19,20) and repeatedly emphasized in the teaching of the apostles.

‘It is God’s will that you should be sanctified: that you should avoid sexual immorality; that each of you should learn to control your own body in a way that is holy and honorable,  not in passionate lust like the pagans, who do not know God;  and that in this matter no one should wrong or take advantage of a brother or sister. The Lord will punish all those who commit such sins, as we told you and warned you before.  For God did not call us to be impure, but to live a holy life. (1 Thessalonians 4:3-7)

In fact in the very last book of the Bible we are told that the unrepentant ‘sexually immoral’ will not enter heaven (Revelation 21:8, 22:15)

Now God gives man free will whether to believe in him or not and to follow his word or not.   So if one wants to live in Biblical sin, that is their will.  However under God's law and for you non-believers --natural law, you cannot force another to accept your unGodly and unnatural behavior.


Tuesday, November 3, 2015

Transgenderism Is A Mental Disorder

It is time to stand up against this lunacy!  The U.S. government on Monday found that a Chicago
suburban high school district discriminated against a transgender student and gave the school a month to provide full access to girls' locker rooms or lose federal funding.  Forget the federal funding!

The student, who has not been named and should be, and the American Civil Liberties Union, which brought a complaint on his ( a man is a man and a woman is a woman)  behalf, applauded the findings, while the school district called them "serious overreach."

After an investigation stemming from a 2013 complaint by the ACLU, and months of negotiations, the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights found Township High School District 211 was violating federal non-discrimination rules.  What about the girls who do not want to see a naked boy with his penis in their showers?  Are we not discriminating against their rights for privacy?

The district has offered a more than reasonable solution and  says transgender students may use their gender-identified locker room if they change and shower privately. The government said a separate changing place was discriminatory because it subjected the student to stigma and different treatment.  Well the student is different.  The student is a boy pretending to be a girl and wanting to shower with girls.  Does nobody see the problem with this?  Have we all gone mad?


In mid-October the school district, with five high schools and two alternative high schools west of Chicago, defied the government, continuing to deny full locker-room access for the transgendered student.

Dr. Paul R. McHugh, the former psychiatrist-in-chief for Johns Hopkins Hospital and its current Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry, said that transgenderism is a “mental disorder” that merits treatment, that sex change is “biologically impossible,” and that people who promote sexual reassignment surgery are collaborating with and promoting a mental disorder.

Dr. McHugh, the author of six books and at least 125 peer-reviewed medical articles, made his remarks in a recent commentary in the Wall Street Journal, where he explained that transgender surgery is not the solution for people who suffer a “disorder of ‘assumption’” – the notion that their maleness or femaleness is different than what nature assigned to them biologically.

He also reported on a new study showing that the suicide rate among transgendered people who had reassignment surgery is 20 times higher than the suicide rate among non-transgender people. Dr. McHugh further noted studies from Vanderbilt University and London’s Portman Clinic of children who had expressed transgender feelings but for whom, over time, 70%-80% “spontaneously lost those feelings.”

It is time that we stop accepting transgender as the norm, when it truly is a mental illness. We as society are doing both more harm to the individual who is ill as well as to society as whole by accepting this.    We are opening the door to attacks to our mothers, wives, daughters and girl friends by allowing men the opportunity to be unaccompanied into places were our women are exposed.  Bruce Jenner, who now calls himself transgender has publicly stated that he is still interested in women.  He himself also still has his man parts.  This is something to truly think about.

Wednesday, September 9, 2015

Another Obama Executive Order This Time With Insurance companies

The illegal jailing of Kim Davis for following the law and
ignoring an unlawful order from Bush appointed pro-homosexual Judge David Bunning was used as cover for the Obama administration to illegally plan regulation, which is imposing law (something the Executive Branch has not been given authority in the Constitution to do), to pay for mutilation surgeries for mentally ill men and women who think they are the opposite gender.

The Daily Caller reports:

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced a planned new regulation Thursday that will require health insurers participating in Obamacare to cover more health procedures sought by the transgendered.

The new rule applies to every health insurer offering plans through Healthcare.gov or any of the state-run Obamacare insurance exchanges. It declares that insurers are prohibited from engaging in discrimination not only on the basis of sex, but also on the basis of gender identity.

In the past, several health insurance plans have categorically excluded health care related to transitioning between genders, often on the grounds that such procedures are often cosmetic, not medically necessary, and elective in nature. Now, such categorical bans will be disallowed, and insurers will have to cover many of the procedures.

HHS says the new rule won’t require insurers to cover all hormone treatments or sex reassignment surgeries, but it will almost certainly require them to cover a large number of them.

First, let’s put in place that the Executive Branch is acting unconstitutionally. Article 1, Section 1 of the US Constitution reads:

All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

How much power for legislation is left for the Executive Branch? How about for the federal courts? Absolutely none. Congress has not passed any legislation that requires paying for mutilation surgeries or hormone treatments for mentally ill people. Therefore, the Executive Branch has no authority to issue such a rule against health insurers. They are usurping it.



Why don’t the insurance companies band together and tell Obama and the feds to stuff it?

Monday, August 31, 2015

Parents Protest At High School - Transgender Male Wants Access To Girls Bathroom / Locker Room!

Students walked out of class on Monday morning over a transgender pupil’s right to use the women’s locker room. About 200 Hillsboro High School in Hills students held their demonstration after 3rd period for about two hours.


There were two groups of demonstrators.  One on the side of transgender student Lila Perry using the female facilities.  The other group wants her to use the faculty’s gender neutral restroom.

Students protesting longer than two hours could face an in school suspension. Superintendent Aaron Cornman to issued a statement that says in part:

“There does come a point when the school day must continue and we cannot condone behaviors that detract from the overall mission of the district.

Actually Superintendent, the school day cannot continue when students feel their safety is at risk.  This is not about political correctness it is about the safety of female staff and students!

Transgender student, Lila Perry, identifies as female. She started using the female facilities at Hillsboro High School starting this school year. She came out last February and used the gender-neutral faculty restroom for gym class last semester.

Parents are saying that their daughters are uncomfortable with the situation. Even though Perry wears dresses and a wig, she is still physically a male.

Last Thursday’s school board meeting had to be moved into the gym after many parents showed up. The topic wasn’t on the agenda but it was clear why they were at the meeting after thunderous applause broke out after one parent spoke.

Derrick Good, a parent of two girls at Hillsboro and an attorney said, “They should have the ability to do whatever they need to do in the privacy of the bathroom without having a male in there.”
Perry said she’s been attacked on social media and fears bullying and violence if she were to start using the boys’ restroom now.


It’s unclear when and if the school board will make a decision on this. Members of the school board said they cannot comment on the matter.

Personally I would not want someone of the opposite sex in my daughter's or son's locker room or bathroom.

Sunday, August 9, 2015

An Article About Safety For Women Leads To A War Of Words And Bullying By A Sterling Heights Michigan Mayor

Earlier today I wrote an article that confirms that Transgenders May Look Like Women But Are Really Men With Manly Desires.  The article was based on Bruce Jenner still being interested in women even though he was surgically altered to look like a woman from the waist up.  This exposed the dangers of allowing transgenders in to opposite sex restrooms and locker rooms.

Appointed Sterling Heights Mayor Michael Taylor
This raised the ire of current Sterling Heights Mayor Michael Taylor as you will see below from the screen captures.  He even went to far as to try to bully me by posting a picture of myself and my girlfriend who passed from cancer earlier this year.   

Michael Taylor became mayor of Sterling Heights by a fluke.  He was a sitting councilman last year and voted for this ordinance, but former Mayor Richard J. Notte died late last year after a battle with cancer.  Michael Taylor was not elected by the people but was appointed Mayor by the majority vote of the Sterling Heights City Council.

Last summer Sterling Heights, Michigan  passed a non-discrimination ordinance by vote of council and mayor.  The public did not have the opportunity to vote on this issue.  The law said it was to  protect lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender residents and visitors from discrimination in housing, public accommodations, and employment and carries a maximum fine of $500 for each violation. 

 There were more than a couple of issues with that ordinance.  The main two issues were it violated one's religious objection to behavior that went against their own beliefs.  

Christians as do Jews believe that God makes no mistakes.  God created man and God created woman.  Why should a business owner who is Christian have to violate his beliefs?  Is that itself discrimination?  

The other main issue is it put into play males and females freely going into each others bathrooms "public accommodations".  If a male decided to dress the part of a woman so he could fulfill his perverted fantasies, what would stop him?  As you will see from the screen shots below the Mayor Michael Taylor, who is an attorney by day, seems to think this is perfectly fine.  He questions whether a transgender had ever attacked a woman in a restroom before as he could not find any proof.  Since Mayor Taylor is an attorney would would have though he would have had better investigative skills.  

But to answer Mayor Taylor's answer, yes instances have occurred and common sense, which Mayor Taylor and much of the Sterling Heights City Council seems to be lacking, dictates it would.  It is human nature.

Here a just a few of many examples:
Jason Pomare
PALMDALE, Calif. (KTLA) — A 33-year-old man was charged Tuesday with allegedly dressing as a woman to secretly videotape women using the restroom at a Macy’s department store.
 Jason Pomare was arrested Saturday after a customer notified store security that a man was in the lady’s room acting suspiciously.
 The woman told security officers that the man was wearing a wig and was dressed as a woman.
 SAN DIEGO — Police Sunday arrested a 30-year-old man who was wearing a pink tutu when he allegedly attacked a woman in a toilet stall at a Big Lots store in Clairemont.
Investigators identified the suspect as Gregory Schwartz, who was arrested around 5:40 p.m. in the area of Clairemont Mesa Boulevard and Diane Avenue, San Diego police Lt. Chuck Kaye said.

About 40 minutes earlier, Kaye said, a woman who had entered a toilet stall in the Big Lots store at 4829 Clairemont Drive was “confronted by a male who had crawled under the stall she occupied.”

Surveillance video showed the man was wearing “a tutu-type thing” he took from the store, Kaye said.  “The suspect grabbed her and attempted to sexually assault her,” he said.
Toronto Canada -- A biological man claiming to be ‘transgender’ so as to gain access to and prey on women at two Toronto shelters was jailed “indefinitely” last week after being declared by a judge a “dangerous offender.”
 Christopher Hambrook, 37, leaned on the ever expanding legal “rights” offered to people who “identify” with the sex opposite their biology. Under the name “Jessica,” he was able to get into the women’s shelters, where he sexually assaulted several women
.
One has to question Mayor Michael Taylor's judgement as to why he thinks this is not a concern.  Would he be concerned if a man went into the same restroom or locker room that his wife and children were currently in?  The myopic thinking of Sterling Heights leadership should be a concern for all Sterling Heights residents and those that come to the city to transact business or recreation.  Keep in mind, Freedom Hill is one such major attraction that draws thousands to many events. 

Below are the screen captures taken today of Sterling Mayor Michael Taylor's faulty logic and bullying form the Sterling Heights Politics Facebook Group:






As you see from the picture above Mayor Michael Taylor thought it would be cute to try to bully me by posting a picture of me and my deceased girlfriend, who passed this year from cancer.




Monday, May 11, 2015

Girl Scouts: Being A Girl Optional, God Is Optional, Our Flag Is Optional




Being a girl is about to become optional for future Girl Scouts. The organization will now accept boys if who consider themselves a girl, bringing the transgender debate into the forefront.

Speaking with my brother-in-law yesterday at church, he is trying desperately to keep this nonsense away from his younger girls. 

They are starting to ask questions from things they see on TV.  Such as why and how a man, Bruce Jenner, is becoming a woman.

Curriculum that the Girl Scouts teach is also concerning. 

The Girl Scouts USA curriculum now reads, "Girl Scouts of the USA makes no attempt to define or interpret the word "God" in the Girl Scout Promise.  It looks to individual members to establish for themselves the nature of their spiritual beliefs.  When making the Girl Scout promise, individuals may substitute wording appropriate to their own beliefs for the word "God."

While many will argue that Girl Scouts is simply respecting the beliefs or non-beliefs of its members, who come from varied backgrounds, this "tolerant" oath denies the One True God, allowing a girl to swear her oath to a tree or an animal or anything else she chooses to substitute for the word "God." 

What is also disturbing is  the treatment of our nation's flag at the 2008 Girl Scout National Council Session and Convention.  The traditional flag ceremony was trashed, as was the playing of our National Anthem.  Flags of all nations were brought in bunched together to Chicago and Earth, Wind and Fire tunes.  That just doesn't' sit well with this Army wife.

My greatest concern lies with the Girl Scouts curriculum called "Journeys."  This new program steadily leads the girls down a path of moral relativism toward the New Age.  (An excellent review of "Journeys" can be read here.)  Having read through the highlights on the Girl Scouts website, I'm left with the distinct impression I've just joined a Zen-yoga, environmental, defeat global warming, free choice, girl-power, modern feminist think-tank.  There's lots of talk about "women's issues", environmental issues, empowerment, and the new "globalism", but no mention of God and very little of country.

By the time the girls reach grades nine and ten, they are introduced to "Girltopia."  This book emphasizes the disparity between the sexes, particularly when it comes to jobs and wages, and asks, "How could everyone create a Girltopia?"  The text then praises three different books on the subject of utopias, including, "The Gate to Women's Country," by feminist author Sheri S. Tepper, who also happens to be the Executive Director of Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood.

In grades 11 and 12, the curriculum is called "Your Voice, Your World: The Power of Advocacy."  The most disturbing part is that at the bottom of each page is a "Voice for Good"  featuring women meant to be role models for the girls to follow.  More than 50 women are named, and only 3 are women of faith, including Mother Teresa.

Mainly, these "role models" are feminists, lesbians, existentialists, communists, and Marxists.  Here are just a few examples:

Elizabeth Gurley Flynn:  labor leader, activist, feminist, founding member of the ACLU and chairwoman of the American Communist Party.

Simone de Beauvoir: existentialist, French author of feminist books including The Second Sex, key player in France's women's liberation movement.

Billie Jean King: retired tennis champion, sued for palimony by lesbian girlfriend while she was still married, first prominent professional athlete to come out as homosexual.

Most disturbing of all is Girl Scouts associations with Planned Parenthood.  In 2004, CEO Kathy Cloninger admitted that they partner with PP to bring sex-education programs to troops all over the country.  Planned Parenthood has no interest in abstinence.  It doesn't benefit their bottom line for teenagers to wait for marriage to have sex.  They are financially invested in promiscuity and all the destructive consequences it brings, especially abortion.  And now it seems Girl Scouts' vision of sexual health and freedom mirrors Planned Parenthood's.  Is that your vision for your daughter?

If you want your daughter to learn the skills of a Girl Scout while keeping her love of herself, God and Country, I would suggest American Heritage Girls. 

Saturday, April 11, 2015

Bill limits people to bathrooms based on biological sex

Sad that a law, which common sense should cover, needs to
be passed to protect the public. 

Transgender activists and progressive groups say they're appalled with a proposed Nevada law forcing students to use bathrooms corresponding to their biological sex.

Republican Assemblywoman Vicki Dooling is sponsoring AB375, which was discussed Friday in the Assembly Judiciary Committee.


The bill would require students in public schools to use locker rooms and restrooms based on their sex at birth.

Saturday, March 7, 2015

Woman Complains When Man Enter's Planet Fitness Locker Room, She Loses Membership

A woman in Midland , Michigan, had her Planet Fitness
Yvette Cormier
membership canceled after she refused to stop telling other gym members that a “man” was using the facilities in the women’s locker room.


Yvette Cormier claims that when she went to exercise at her local Planet Fitness in Midland on Feb. 28, she came across a male gym-goer in the women’s locker room. "I was blocked, because a man was standing there," Cormier told WNEM TV 5 in Saginaw, Michigan on Friday.

"It freaked me out because, why is a man in here?" Cormier complained to the front desk. “This is very unprofessional. This is very scary,” Cormier added. “They told me the same thing, that he was allowed in there because that’s the sex he wants to be.”  Cormier said she understood that some men identify as women and that some women identify as men but said the person had a very masculine appearance.

The person has not been identified. Planet Fitness is well-known for its “judgment-free policy” and a statement released by McCall Gosselin, public relations director for the popular chain of gyms, said that any member can use the locker room that corresponds with the gender a person identifies with.

“Our gender identity non-discrimination policy states that members and guests may use all gym facilities based on their sincere self-reported gender identity,” the statement said.

“The manner in which this member expressed her concerns about the policy exhibited behavior that management at the Midland club deemed inappropriate and disruptive to other members, which is a violation of the membership agreement and as a result her membership was cancelled."

Meanwhile, Cormier believed the incident was “one-sided” and that she was “the only one being punished.” She also asked that Planet Fitness provide a third locker room for transgendered people.







Thursday, October 2, 2014

Transgender Man Exposes Himself To Women And Little Girls In Bathroom Then Gets Away With It

A Washington college said their non-discrimination policy prevents them from stopping a transgender man from
exposing himself to young girls inside a women’s locker room, according to a group of concerned parents.

“Little girls should not be exposed to naked men, period,” said David Hacker, senior legal counsel with the Alliance Defending Freedom. A group of concerned parents contacted the legal firm for help.

Hacker said a 45-year-old male student, who dresses as a woman and goes by the name Colleen Francis, undressed and exposed his genitals on several occasions inside the woman’s locker room at Evergreen State College.

Students from nearby Olympia High School as well as children at a local swimming club share locker rooms with the college.

According to a police report, the mother of a 17-year-old girl complained after her daughter saw the transgender individual walking naked in the locker room. A female swim coach confronted the man sprawled out in a sauna exposing himself. She ordered him to leave and called police.

The coach later apologized when she discovered the man was transgendered but explained there were girls using the facility as young as six years old who weren’t used to seeing male genitals.


According to the police report, the local district attorney probably will not pursue charges because he said the “criminal law is very vague in this area.”