PHILADELPHIA — On May 13, 1985, an American city did something almost unimaginable: Philadelphia police dropped a bomb from a helicopter onto an occupied row house in the middle of a predominantly Black residential neighborhood.
This was not a battlefield overseas. It was Osage Avenue in West Philadelphia, a middle-class neighborhood where families lived in tightly packed row houses.
The target was MOVE, a radical organization whose members had been engaged in years of bitter and sometimes violent conflict with Philadelphia authorities.
But the history of May 13 cannot be understood simply as another police standoff that went terribly wrong.
Police fired thousands of rounds, deployed explosives and ultimately dropped a bomb containing C-4 and Tovex onto the MOVE house. When the resulting fire began spreading, authorities initially allowed it to burn as part of their effort to destroy a fortified rooftop bunker.
By the end, much of the block was gone.
And more than four decades later, the event leaves behind a disturbing historical question:
Would authorities have dropped a bomb and allowed the resulting fire to spread if this had been an affluent white neighborhood?
History cannot prove what officials would have done under a different set of circumstances. But the question has followed the MOVE bombing for decades because the neighborhood that actually absorbed the consequences was predominantly Black.
Years of Conflict
MOVE was founded in Philadelphia in the early 1970s by John Africa. The organization combined revolutionary and anti-establishment beliefs with an unconventional back-to-nature lifestyle.
Its relationship with Philadelphia authorities became increasingly hostile.
A 1978 confrontation ended in gunfire and the death of Philadelphia police Officer James Ramp. Nine MOVE members were later convicted in connection with the confrontation.
By the early 1980s, MOVE members were living at 6221 Osage Avenue.
Their own neighbors had serious complaints.
Residents complained about amplified messages broadcast from the property, conditions around the house and MOVE members' behavior. A fortified bunker was constructed on the roof.
Authorities eventually obtained arrest warrants for several MOVE members.
There were legitimate reasons for police intervention.
What remains extraordinary is how that intervention escalated.
Thousands of Rounds — Then a Bomb
Police surrounded the property early on May 13 to execute the warrants.
The confrontation quickly turned violent.
Police used tear gas, water cannons, firearms and explosives. Roughly 10,000 rounds were fired during the operation.
Hours later, officials approved another tactic.
A Pennsylvania State Police helicopter flew above the neighborhood carrying members of the Philadelphia police bomb squad.
An explosive charge containing C-4 and Tovex was dropped onto the fortified structure on the roof.
At approximately 5:27 p.m., it exploded.
An American police department had bombed an occupied house in an American city.
Thirteen Inside. Two Survived.
There were 13 MOVE members inside the house when the confrontation unfolded.
Eleven died.
The dead were six adults and five children, including MOVE founder John Africa.
Only two people survived the destruction of the house: adult MOVE member Ramona Africa and Birdie Africa, a 13-year-old boy.
Both escaped badly burned.
The distinction matters because accounts of the bombing sometimes leave unclear exactly how many people were inside, how many were children and how many escaped.
The overwhelming majority of the people inside the house did not survive.
The Decision That Destroyed a Neighborhood
The bomb itself was only part of the catastrophe.
The explosion started a fire.
Officials initially allowed that fire to burn because they wanted it to destroy the rooftop bunker.
But Osage Avenue consisted of connected row houses.
The flames spread.
By the time the fire was brought under control, 61 homes had been destroyed and more than 250 neighborhood residents were homeless.
Most of those people were not members of MOVE.
They were neighbors — many of whom had themselves repeatedly complained to city officials about MOVE and wanted the government to resolve the situation.
Instead, they lost their homes.
Would This Have Happened in a White Neighborhood?
That question was raised almost immediately after the destruction.
It deserves to be asked carefully because no one can prove what Philadelphia officials would have done in a hypothetical white neighborhood.
But the racial context cannot simply be removed from the history.
Osage Avenue was part of a predominantly African American community. The people whose homes were destroyed were largely Black residents.
One neighborhood resident who lost his home, Gerald Renfrow, publicly questioned whether officials would have permitted such destruction in a white neighborhood.
That question has endured because of the sheer extremity of the government's response.
Would police have fired thousands of rounds into a row house in a wealthy white neighborhood?
Would officials have authorized explosives?
Would a helicopter have been permitted to drop a bomb?
And after the explosion started a fire, would authorities have deliberately allowed it to continue burning while neighboring homes were threatened?
Those questions do not erase MOVE's conduct, the outstanding warrants or the danger police faced.
They ask something different:
Were the lives and homes on Osage Avenue afforded the same protection that Americans would expect government to provide in a more politically powerful community?
The City's Own Commission Condemned the Decision
Philadelphia's own investigation delivered a devastating assessment.
The Philadelphia Special Investigation Commission examined the decisions made before and during the confrontation.
Its conclusion about the bombing was unmistakable:
Dropping a bomb on an occupied row house was "unconscionable."
The investigation sharply criticized the city's planning and decision-making.
Mayor W. Wilson Goode, Philadelphia's first Black mayor, accepted responsibility as the city's chief executive, although he said he had not personally ordered the bombing.
Years of litigation followed, and a federal jury later found that excessive force had been used and awarded damages.
No city official was criminally charged over the bombing.
More Than a Failed Police Operation
The MOVE bombing should not be remembered merely as an unusual police confrontation.
Its historical significance is larger.
A municipal government confronted an armed and deeply controversial organization in a Black residential neighborhood. The confrontation escalated until police employed military-style explosives from the air. Officials then made the decision to allow the resulting fire to burn, and dozens of surrounding homes were consumed.
There is room in an accurate history for more than one truth.
MOVE had engaged in confrontational behavior. Neighbors had legitimate grievances. Police had warrants to execute. Officers faced a dangerous situation.
None of those facts requires minimizing what the government did next.
Philadelphia bombed an occupied row house.
Children were inside.
The fire was allowed to burn.
A predominantly Black neighborhood paid the price.
That is why the most uncomfortable question surrounding May 13, 1985, remains relevant decades later:
If Osage Avenue had been a wealthy white neighborhood, would authorities have believed that dropping a bomb and risking the destruction of the surrounding community was an acceptable option?
We cannot rerun history to discover the answer.
But the fact that the question still needs to be asked is part of the legacy of the day Philadelphia became known as "the city that bombed itself."
No comments:
Post a Comment