Michigan's road debate continues.
By Senator Patrick Colbeck |
Proponents of tax increases have an extremely strong
lobbying base. They have incessantly pushed a false narrative that our roads
cannot be fixed without tax increases, despite our citizens already being
subject to the fifth highest gas taxes in the country. After having served as
vice chairman of the Senate Transportation Subcommittee on Appropriations for
the past four years, I happen to have a different opinion.
Here are some simple facts for Michiganians to consider.
When I started my service in the Legislature four years ago, our state budget
was $46.8 billion. The last budget that we enacted for FY2014-2015 was $53.1
billion. That is an increase of $6.3 billion — $1.1 billion of that went toward
education; $840 million has already gone toward our roads. That leaves $4.3
billion unaccounted for in our list of budget priorities.
What are the odds that folks would find most, if not all, of
the spending items associated with this $4.3 billion less important than fixing
our roads? Would we raise taxes to pay for film incentives? Would we raise
taxes to pay for other corporate incentive packages? The funds for these
programs could be used for roads, yet we are being sold a narrative that we
need a tax increase to pay for our roads. Why not push the tax increase
discussion onto these programs instead?
Compound these observations with the fact that a significant
portion of our transportation budget does not go towards fixing our roads. Did
you know that 10 percent of the taxes collected under the most recent
Senate-passed bill to increase gas taxes would go toward rail and mass-transit
programs? Diverting funds to rail and mass transit will not fix a single
pothole. Funny, I don't recall trains and busses being part of the "Just
fix the roads" propaganda blitz. Do you?
Against this backdrop, I maintain that we do not get the bang
for the road funding buck that we deserve in Michigan. In earlier op-eds, I
cited findings from the 20th Annual Highway Report compiled by the Reason
Foundation. It stated that Michigan spends 53 percent more per mile than the
national average on our roads. Their latest study shows that Michigan still
spends 27 percent more per mile than the national average and 7 percent more
per lane-mile than the national average. Despite this, our road conditions have
consistently ranked 40th or worse.
When I cite such figures, I am assaulted by proponents of
increased taxes, who point out the influence of our winter climate on our poor
road conditions.
Minnesota, not exactly a winter getaway for warm weather
enthusiasts, spends 18 percent less per mile than the national average, yet has
higher rural road quality.
Truck weights are also cited as a major contributor to the
poor quality of our roads. I'm all for lowering truck weights. In fact, the
Senate has considered legislation to do just that, but as an engineer I am
bothered by the lack of fundamental engineering data on this topic. Despite
years of inquiries, I have yet to find a specification that connects the dots
between how long our roads should last under a given load profile and the road
designs that we build. It is very difficult to analyze the impact of truck
weights and longer life road designs without this data.
The good news is, we agree that we need to fix our roads.
The bad news is that there are still too many folks who choose to make their
point by misrepresenting the views of folks like me who do not believe that we
need to raise taxes. Proponents of tax increases have poured significant time
and money into making us believe that tax increases are the only
"rational" solution to our road woes. Meanwhile, Michiganians pour
out the fruits of their labor towards satisfying government's insatiable
appetite for more of their hard-earned money.
Tax increases should always be the last option considered.
All too often, though, they are the first. It is time we changed our
priorities.
State Sen. Patrick Colbeck, R-Canton, represents the 7th
District.
No comments:
Post a Comment