Showing posts with label Gretchen Whitmer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gretchen Whitmer. Show all posts

Saturday, June 13, 2026

Gordie Howe International Bridge Opening Delayed Amid Political Dispute and Economic Concerns

  

DETROIT, Mich. — The long-awaited opening of the $4.7 billion Gordie Howe International Bridge, one of the largest infrastructure projects in North American history, has reportedly been delayed amid a growing political dispute involving officials from the Trump administration.

Publicly, Canadian officials cited unresolved issues as the reason for postponing the bridge's ribbon-cutting ceremony. However, sources familiar with the situation say concerns over potential retaliation from the Trump administration played a significant role in the decision to delay the event.

The bridge, which spans the Detroit River between Detroit, Michigan and Windsor, Ontario, is expected to become a critical trade corridor connecting the United States and Canada. Once operational, it will provide an alternative crossing to the privately owned Ambassador Bridge and is projected to handle a significant portion of the nearly $300 billion in annual trade between the two countries.

Questions surrounding the delay intensified after reports surfaced that two senior

Trump administration officials objected to plans for a public opening ceremony. Critics have pointed to meetings between administration officials and members of the billionaire family that owns the competing Ambassador Bridge, raising allegations of potential conflicts of interest and prompting renewed scrutiny of the political forces surrounding the project.

Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer's office pushed back against suggestions that technical or construction-related problems were responsible for the postponement. According to state officials, the bridge itself is substantially complete and no significant engineering or safety concerns have been identified that would justify delaying the ceremonial opening.

The dispute has quickly become a political flashpoint in Michigan, where the bridge has long enjoyed bipartisan support due to its anticipated economic benefits.

Former Congressman and Republican U.S. Senate candidate Mike Rogers defended President Donald Trump's handling of the situation, arguing that additional negotiations could ultimately result in a better deal for American workers and taxpayers.

However, economic development experts warn that continued delays carry significant costs. Reports indicate that postponements affecting associated border infrastructure and trade operations could cost the regional economy an estimated $6 million per week. Business leaders on both sides of the border have emphasized the importance of opening the crossing as soon as possible to improve freight movement, reduce congestion, and strengthen supply chains that are vital to Michigan's manufacturing sector.

Republican gubernatorial candidate John James has also defended the Trump administration's approach despite the fact that members of his family have historically expressed support for the Gordie Howe International Bridge project. James has argued that ensuring favorable terms for American interests should remain the top priority before the crossing officially opens.

The controversy comes as Michigan prepares for another highly competitive election cycle, with transportation, trade, and economic development expected to play major roles in statewide campaigns. For many local officials and business organizations, however, the primary concern remains getting the bridge operational and delivering the economic benefits that supporters have promised for more than a decade.

As political leaders continue to debate the circumstances surrounding the delay, businesses, truckers, and residents throughout the Detroit-Windsor region are left waiting for the opening of a bridge that was designed to strengthen one of the most important international trade relationships in the world.

Friday, June 9, 2017

Democrat Party Fined A Record Amount For Election Fraud



While the Democrats keep trying to stick made up corruption and collusion charges against Donald Trump, their party continues to sneak by in breaking elections laws.    In Michigan one of the largest fines was just issued for a violation of election laws! 

The Detroit Free Press reports:

“Games of chance have always been risky, but they also just got very costly for the Michigan Democratic Party.

The party has agreed to pay a hefty $500,000 civil fine to the Federal Elections Commission — one of the largest penalties every levied by that office — after an internal investigation of its bingo operation, which was used for political fund-raising, found numerous examples of shoddy record keeping, contributions that exceeded limits and campaign finance reporting inaccuracies. one of the largest fines eve levied by the federal elections commission.

It’s a fine that far exceeds the average penalty levied against candidates and political organizations over the years. The highest average fine over the past 40 years was $179,499 in 2006.

But the $500,000 fine will put a crimp in the party’s budget. It must pay $100,000 immediately and then pay off the rest in quarterly installments through mid-2019.  The party’s federal campaign fund has a balance of $147,915, according to reports filed with the FEC. Under state law, a political party’s state campaign finance reports do not have to include a summary sheet, which would detail how much disposable cash the party

Thursday, December 18, 2014

Michigan Democrats And Republicans Greenlight Ballot Proposal To Raise Sales Tax To 7%

So we ended up getting a real lump of coal for Christmas from our cowardly legislators who waited till the 11th hour to dump a road proposal on us and then run for the hills claiming Christmas break. 

 Jase Bolger and Randy Richardville on the Republican side Gretchen Whitmer and Tim Grimell on the Democrat side have decided to push through a plan that will raise our sales tax to 7% (so for every $100 you give Lansing $7) . They are also eliminating our sales tax on gas (which is a bait and switch) and now taxing wholesale gas. This bait and switch will raise our gas prices by 5 cents, so for every $100 of gas $5 goes to Lansing.  

Jase Bolger, Randy Richardville, Tim Griemel, Gretchen Whitmer
The Leadership Behind The Sale Tax And Gas Tax Increase Ballot Proposal

These tax and spenders will say we can afford it because the price of gas is now $2. Again this is a bait and switch, as gas prices will surely rise again to the $4 level. One war, one hurricane, one oil refinery fire is all that it will take. 

Also part of this package gives public transportation another $100 million of our hard earned dollars on an annual basis. If public transportation is so viable, why can't it self sustain itself? 

Voters get to vote on this but our sneaky legislators decided May would be the best time to vote on this issue, so they can get their camp to get this to passing. They know very well that May has very low voter turn out.

Several legislators questioned the need for a tax increase including Republican State Senator Patrick Colbeck and Republican State Representative Tom McMillin. 

Senator Colbeck stated recently " Here are some simple
Senator Patrick Colbeck 
facts for Michiganians to consider. When I started my service in the Legislature four years ago, our state budget was $46.8 billion. The last budget that we enacted for FY2014-2015 was $53.1 billion. That is an increase of $6.3 billion — $1.1 billion of that went toward education; $840 million has already gone toward our roads. That leaves $4.3 billion unaccounted for in our list of budget priorities. 
What are the odds that folks would find most, if not all, of the spending items associated with this $4.3 billion less important than fixing our roads?"

Commenting on the Detroit News Headline ‘Voters will be asked for tax increase to fix roads’  State Representative Tom McMillin who is against this tax increase stated, "This headline is actually very
false. Almost none of the 1% increase in sales tax goes to roads - it will go to schools, to the low-income and to local governments. If the sales tax hike in May fails, it is true that all the bills in this road funding package is repealed." 

Tom also said Governor Snyder saying that the additional cost for gas being a nickle or less is misleading.  He said "The gas tax will actually be about 12 cents higher.....going from 19 cents to 14.9% (with a minimum of 41 cents per gallon - but you have to take into effect that the 6% sales tax is removed)."

Tom also stated later “I've never seen the Dems so engaged on the floor with legislation - obviously they have a lot of say in the gas tax increase package.”

Norm Hughes Chair of the Michigan Conservative Union went so far as to write the legislators with 5 strong key points as to why any tax increase to fix the road is not needed. 

++ OUR MESSAGE TO THE LEGISLATURE: (Sent 3:00 PM 12/18/14)Dear Legislator; We are grateful you are not voting a tax increase today and WE ASK YOU TO VOTE NO on the ballot proposal!!!
 While all details of the "transportation fix" are not known to us yet, the bottom line is it increases taxes on several fronts. It CONTINUES to grow governments on the State and local levels and seeks to impose inter-state taxes that may violate the U.S. Constitution. It does not repeal prevailing wage laws and does not assure more competitive and more frugal purchase of government construction. It throws money at the problem instead of make frugal choices like our families must. 1) You have already grown State government at a brisk pace. The budget is up 16% - seven BILLION dollars in just four years. Georgia has 100,000 more people and provides adequate state services for $ 10 Billion a year less.
 2) Spending more than a billion dollars a week, Michigan certainly can find a few more dollars for roads if that is a true priority. If $1 Billion were a true need and priority, that requires a roll-back of just 2% of the budget elsewhere.
 3) We have seen no details on how or why local road spending needs to increase 73% as the Governor proposes. Grand Traverse has already passed it's own road funding increase, and Lapeer rejected an increase. The decision on local funding needs to be made on the county or local level where residents and voters know best, the need and affordability. THE need for an annual $1.2 BILLION INCREASE in perpetuity is NOT exhibited or proven.
 4) People are still hurting in this state. Unemployed and underemployed and senior families cannot afford more taxes increases. They already have been hit by millions of dollars in tax and fee increases.
 5) Raising more taxes will stifle the fledgling and sporadic economic growth Michigan is supposedly seeing.
Michigan took great steps towards improving the chances for jobs by passing Michigan Freedom To Work labor freedom laws, and changing the business tax structure.

Then it undermined those gains by going on a binge of government growth and increasing personal taxes. The trend has been towards protecting government income, instead of citizens. Let’s hope the new legislature will take a serious look at ALL expenditures and regulations and get governments off our backs and out of our purses.

Voters Do Not Want a Gas Tax Increase: 60.5% of voters oppose any road tax increase.
 “The statewide survey of 600 likely voters May 20-22 found 45.5 percent say the state already has enough moneyto spend on roads, and that the current pot of fuel taxes and vehicle fees needs to be better spent. Another 15 percent reject a small tax increase and say that while extra money for roads and bridges may be needed, it should be found elsewhere in the state budget.” From The Detroit News:http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20140528/METRO/305280144…

We encourage you to vote against putting this scheme on the ballot and let the next legislature have a fresh look at expenditures and regulations, and alternatives to fix our roads.
This will be a rated vote.
 Thank you for serving, and best wishes for a wonderful and reverent HOLYday season.
Norm Hughes I, ChairMichigan Conservative UnionOxford, Mi. 48371

Sunday, October 5, 2014

Mark Schauer Is Counting On Voter's Forgetting His Campaign "Money Laundering" Scheme

Mark Schauer Charged With The Largest Fine
In Michigan History For Campaign Fraud

Mark Schauer has spent his time in Michigan representing special interests and partisan policies that hurt our state and families. Schauer doesn't want voters to remember that he was hit with the largest fine in Michigan’s history for what several media outlets , including the Battle Creek Inquirer called ‘money laundering’ in 2009.

Mark Schauer chaired the Senate Democratic Campaign Committee and oversaw the Senate Democratic Fund, for which his big-talking chief of staff, Ken Brock, took over as treasurer.

The fund raked in $440,000 above the legal limit of $20,000 per person – which the Dems don’t deny. Twelve senatorial candidate committees did, with Schauer’s as the worst offender at $187,000.

The moolah was instantly pumped into the campaigns of four key candidates, three of whom were trounced anyway.

For state races, this is a staggering chunk of change. The grievance is pretty cut and dried (some might call it money laundering). When seven candidates got wind of the GOP’s secretary of state complaint, they ostensibly demanded a refund. Marky-Mark did not.

Here’s how Schauer’s illegal scheme worked. The Congressman, then a state legislator decided to go ahead and raise a bunch of illegal campaign cash. He received illegal money from Democrats including Carl Williams, Alexander Lipsey, Bob Schockman, Gretchen Whitmer, Mickey Switalski, Buzz Thomas, Liz Brater, Mike Prusi, Gilda Jacobs, Glenn Anderson and Mark Slavens and then pitched in $187,000 himself. Mind you, the limit is $20,000.

Once the Democrats realized they’d been discovered each of the folks who were still working in the legislature went ahead and asked for refunds.

Essentially they said “oops, our mistake, don’t punish us for it!” Prusi, Whitmer, Switalski, Brater, Thomas, Slavens and Jacobs all took their illegal cash back, admitting they’d been caught with their hands in the cookie jar and trying to make things right (well after the fact).


But no such change of heart from Mark Schauer. When he breaks the law he stands by his criminal activity! And he stood by his man, too. Ken Brock

Tuesday, July 1, 2014

Tom McMillin & Mike Bishop: Who is the true Conservative Candidate for Michigan's 8th District?

One can not hide from their past. Michigan's Republican's have let many of their supporters down by siding with the liberals and helping push their agenda of bigger government through higher taxes, more regulations and less freedoms.
Side By Side Comparison: Bishop Votes With Democrat Leader Whitmer

Recently,Independents for Responsible Government (I4RG)

In Michigan's 8th District, both Mike Bishop and Tom McMillin, are the two Republican candidates vying for the office of Congressman for that district.  The scorecard covers the years from 2009 to 2010 when both served in the Michigan Legislature.  Mike Bishop is accusing Tom McMillin of not being conservative and a tax and spend politician.  Well if one reviews the scorecard it is quite apparent to see why the Lansing based news service MIRS rated Mike Bishop - MOST LIBERAL (2008) and Tom McMillin - MOST CONSERVATIVE (2009).

One has to ask why Mike Bishop, who says he is conservative, has Mike Rogers campaigning for him? Mike Rogers has been for the NSA, NDAA, CIPSA, and SOPA.  All government agencies and laws that spy and restrict freedoms of the citizens of this country.   

Tom McMillin is against the NSA, NDAA, CIPSA, and SOPA.  Tom McMillin also calls for the audit of the Federal Reserve as well as reigning in the IRS.  

When one see the voting records side by side, it becomes quite apparent who the true Conservative. 

Scorecard using I4RG format
First
Name
Mike
Randy
Gretchen
Jase
Brian
Justin
Tom
Last
Name
Party
R
R
D
R
R
R
R
Position in 2009-2010
State
Senator
State
Senator
State
Senator
State
Rep.
State
Rep.
State
Rep.
State
Rep.
District
Senate 12
    Senate     17
Senate 12
House 63
House 87
House 72
House 45
% of votes in favor of taxpayers
11%
11%
11%
44%
50%
94%
94%
Correct
Vote Is
NO
X
X
X
X
X
Correct
Vote Is
NO
X
X
X
X
X
Correct
Vote Is
NO
X
X
X
X
Correct
Vote Is
NO
X
X
X
X
X
Correct
Vote Is
NO
X
X
X
X
Correct
Vote Is
NO
X
X
X
X
X
Correct
Vote Is
NO
X
X
X
E
X
Correct
Vote Is
Yes
Correct
Vote Is
NO
X
X
X
X
X
Correct
Vote Is
NO
X
X
X
Correct
Vote Is
NO
X
X
X
Correct
Vote Is
NO
X
X
X
Correct
Vote Is
NO
X
X
X
Correct
Vote Is
NO
X
X
X
X
Correct
Vote Is
NO
X
X
X
X
Correct
Vote Is
Yes
E
X
Correct
Vote Is
NO
X
X
X
X
X
Correct
Vote Is
NO
X
X
X
X
X