The killing of three more journalists in Gaza—including a contributor to CBS News—is not an isolated tragedy. It is evidence of a pattern, a policy, and a crime scene that now spans more than a year.
As reported by The Washington Post, these latest killings occurred despite a U.S.-backed ceasefire that was supposed to restrain hostilities beginning in October. Instead, Israel continued lethal operations that once again claimed the lives of clearly identifiable media workers.
This is not a failure of intelligence.
This is not an accident of war.
This is the elimination of witnesses.
Count One: The Deliberate Targeting of Journalists
According to Reporters Without Borders, approximately 220 journalists have been killed in Gaza since October 2023. That number alone dwarfs journalist death tolls in nearly every modern conflict combined over comparable periods.
Journalists have been killed:
In their homes
In marked press vests
While reporting live
While traveling in known media convoys
While sheltering with their families
These are not battlefield crossfires. These are predictable outcomes of sustained military practices in densely populated civilian areas, carried out with full knowledge that journalists are present.
Under international humanitarian law, journalists are civilians. Killing them without lawful military necessity is a war crime.
Count Two: Reckless Disregard for Civilian Protections
Israel has repeatedly justified journalist deaths by invoking vague claims of “militant presence,” often after the fact and without transparent evidence. In numerous cases, no active combat was occurring at the time of the strike. In others, the alleged military target was never identified at all.
This pattern meets the legal threshold for reckless disregard, and in some cases, intentional targeting—both prosecutable under the Geneva Conventions and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
A military that knows journalists are present, strikes anyway, and then refuses independent investigation is not defending itself.
It is asserting impunity.
Count Three: Obstruction of Accountability
Israel has:
Blocked independent international investigators
Restricted foreign press access to Gaza
Conducted internal military “reviews” that rarely result in charges
Faced no meaningful consequences from its primary military backer, the United States
This is not accountability. It is self-policing theater.
The absence of consequences has sent a clear signal: journalists are expendable, and their deaths will not interrupt arms shipments, diplomatic cover, or financial support.
Count Four: A War on Visibility
With international journalists largely barred from Gaza, Palestinian reporters have served as the world’s eyes and ears. Killing them does not just end lives—it erases documentation, silences testimony, and obscures civilian suffering.
This is how modern warfare hides itself:
Not by denying violence,
but by killing those who record it.
When journalists die in such numbers, truth becomes the next casualty.
Conclusion: The Evidence Is Overwhelming
Two hundred and twenty journalists dead.
Repeated strikes during ceasefire periods.
No transparent investigations.
No accountability.
At some point, denial becomes complicity.
The question is no longer whether journalists are being killed in Gaza.
The question is why the international community continues to tolerate it.
History will not judge this silence kindly.
No comments:
Post a Comment