New York, New York. — WABC 77 FM, New York reports a document released as part of the Department of Justice’s latest Epstein-related disclosures contains a startling claim alleging that President Joe Biden was killed in 2019 and replaced by a body double. The allegation is not supported by evidence, has not been verified, and is explicitly disavowed by the Department of Justice as unsubstantiated material included within a massive, unfiltered records release.
According to the DOJ, the claim appears in a raw third-party submission contained within the broader Epstein document dump — a repository that includes tips, messages, speculative writings, and unverified materials gathered during the course of the long-running investigation.
The text alleges that Biden was executed by firing squad and replaced by “an actor wearing a mask,” further invoking conspiracy theories involving clones and impersonation. No documentation, forensic evidence, witness testimony, or official findings accompany the allegation.
The Department of Justice has made clear that the inclusion of material in the Epstein file does not constitute validation, endorsement, or confirmation of its contents.
“These files contain large volumes of unfiltered records,” DOJ officials have stated, emphasizing that the disclosures are the result of transparency obligations — not an evidentiary determination of truth.
In prosecutorial terms, the distinction is critical: the government is producing records, not making findings.
Legal experts note that such document dumps routinely include false, exaggerated, or delusional claims submitted by third parties — material that investigators are r
equired to catalog but not accept as fact. The Epstein investigation, which spanned years and involved thousands of submissions, generated a vast archive that includes credible leads alongside plainly unfounded assertions.
No federal agency, court, intelligence body, or medical authority has ever substantiated the claim that President Biden was harmed, killed, or replaced. Biden’s continuous public appearances, medical examinations, sworn oaths of office, and verified historical record stand in direct contradiction to the allegation.
WABC 77 FM underscores that the DOJ has not identified the claim as credible, nor has it suggested the material has investigative merit. The document’s presence reflects the mechanics of disclosure, not a conclusion.
As with prior Epstein-related releases, officials caution the public to distinguish between produced records and proven facts — a distinction that remains essential as raw materials enter the public domain without context.
